I HATE MY JOB

BY PAMELA GRUNDY

 

The Great American Teacher Witch Hunt »
Friday
19Mar2010

Is the American Middle Class Disappearing or Is It Already Gone? 

If you live in the United States and work for a living, you probably think that your household wages put you and your family squarely in the social category deceptively tagged “the middle class.” Most wage earners in the U.S. identify themselves this way, no matter whether their incomes are greatly above or greatly below the actual middle on any given chart.

But did you know that the actual middle of the income scale (statistically speaking) provides way less money than is required to live a middle class American life as depicted on TV and in the media at large?

Most Americans don’t seem to know that.

For example, many households enjoying annual incomes in excess of $100,000 consider themselves to be middle class and say so freely, often while fretting about how much they will have to pay in taxes next year.

During the last presidential campaign, households earning over $250,000 argued vigorously that in America today, $250,000 is a solidly middle class income—especially in big cities—and that any plan to rescind the Bush tax cuts for households earning more than that was therefore a direct attack on the middle class.

Yet according to data collected by the U.S Census Bureau in 2005, only 15% of the households in the United States earn over $100,000 and only 1.5% of the households in the U.S. earn over $250,000. By any mathematical standard, the top 1.5% of a group of wage earners cannot be considered to be in the “middle” of anything.  And yet, they clearly want to say that they are.

You Are Solidly Middle Class If Your Household Income Is Between $28,000 and $250,000

Families earning the dead center median household income of $44,389 also think of themselves as middle class. That figure—$44,389—is the halfway mark, the number at which exactly 50% of the households fall short and 50% don’t, so claiming to be middle class if you land here at least makes statistical sense. A household earning $44,389, depending on withholding and the number of deductions and so on, takes home about $600-$650 each week.

But—and this is kind of a big ‘but’—this $45K median household income is most frequently split between two working halves of a married couple, neither of whom earns anything close to middle income wages.

For instance, the median annual income for a man in the U.S. currently is just over $45K and for a woman it is just over $33K, but the median HOUSEHOLD income is around $45K-$51K (depending on which numbers you tap). How is it then that a household that earns $45K-$51K can lay claim to middle class status?

Most of these households achieve their ‘middle class’ status by combining one part-time income and one below-median income. In reality, both of the adults have lower than median wages. Neither of them separately approaches middle class status, but when they pool their wages we accept their claim to being part of the ‘middle class.’ Retaining that identity tends to be very emotionally important to them.

It gets even more disturbing when we look at American wages more carefully. Consider this: Half of the households in the United States live on less than $45,000 per year. That’s HOUSEHOLDS, not individuals—kids, parents, grandma or grandpa and the dog—all scraping by on a combined income of less than $45K annually.

Nearly a third of those households earning under $45K (or exactly 28.22% as of 2005) make less than $25,000 annually. $25,000 for an entire household still doesn’t put that household at the official government poverty level (which by the way has remained essentially stationary since the 1960s).

A person making $25,000 per year takes home between $325 and $365 clear each week. How many people could support a family on that? How reasonable is it to expect families to survive on this?

What Does a Middle Class Lifestyle Really Cost?

If you look at recent household income charts compiled by the U.S. Census, the smallest number of households are found at the $75K-$100K level. Yet in order for a household to maintain a middle class lifestyle the way that lifestyle is portrayed on TV and in the media, $75K is pretty much the minimum household income required.

Assuming our imaginary middle class family can find a home for around $130,000 (not likely in some areas), and assuming two newer automobiles cost between $25,000 and $40,000 each (which they do), weekly expenses to keep a home, two cars, and a couple of kids in a suburban subdivision break down like this:

  • Mortgage (with taxes and insurance escrowed): $1200 or more
  • Car payments: $200-300 each, or around $500
  • Car insurance: $200
  • Utilities: $300 (minimum, this will vary wildly according to locale and may be MUCH, much higher)
  • Food: $600 (assuming a family of 4, $150 per week on groceries and sundries)
  • Public school fees for two kids: $50
  • Cable, Internet connection: $130
  • Cell phones: $100
  • Health insurance (employee portion only): $150
  • Out-of-pocket health care costs w/deductibles paid and 20% maximum limit reached: $275
  • Dental work, car repairs and other surprise one-time expenses: $300
  • Gasoline/commuting costs for two cars: $100

Total these expenses up and what is needed to cover them comes to right around $4000 per month or $1000 clear each week. To clear $1000 weekly, you need an annual salary of right around $75K. That salary will barely get you into this coveted middle class lifestyle. Nothing can go wrong, no emergencies can occur. You can’t send your kids to private school. Saving anything at all will be nearly impossible. Forget 401K contributions—not gonna happen with these kinds of outside financial obligations. Notice that I have also not included a clothing budget, a VISA card payment (or any unsecured debt—even though the average in the U.S. is around $8,000 per person), or any cash for vacations or leisure activities—only the bare necessities are in this total.

Where we will all be working very soon (if we’re lucky)

Reality Check, Please!

So why bring any of this up at all? Why bring it up now?

I only bring it up because 1) the media and politicians CONSTANTLY focus on the needs and problems of the middle class as if there actually is one, and 2) I think the term ‘middle class’ in America has become a code word for something like ‘normal’ or ‘not poor’; or even uglier, ‘not irresponsible’, or uglier still, ‘white or with white values—good Americans, the good ones, not those bad ones with no money’. 

When people who are not statistically middle class by actual income rush to identify themselves with an elite group to which almost no one really belongs, it begs the question, “Why?” What’s up with that? When did working for a living or having less become shameful? When did we start judging one another purely on our stuff and our personal stash of cash?

Even during the Great Depression, people were nicer and more realistic than that.

Why not tell the truth about income and embrace the truth? Why not talk about real situations in real terms of declining wages and increasing pressures and costs? Why not talk about class in a way that addresses what the majority of Americans are really experiencing day in and day out instead of pretending that some of us are better than others by virtue of our appearance, expressed values, and financial worth?

Statistically speaking, it can be easily shown that most ‘middle class’ Americans are anything but middle class, and that those few who have managed to drag themselves and their familes across the threshold of a middle class lifestyle often owe so much money in unsecured debt that they are constantly on the verge of falling into the economic abyss.

The truth is, the American middle class has been gone for at least a decade, and the gap between the working poor and the incredibly rich gets bigger every day.  Until that fact starts to get some uptake in political rhetoric and in everyday discussions about ideology and ideas, I don’t see how opportunity in America comes back.

Until we stop pretending and start organizing, I think it just gets worse.


Reader Comments (6)

How freaky that you wrote this today! I was just telling my son about these exact statistics (only scattered, not quite as well put and perfectly broken down). I told him that in order to really solve our problems, one of two things would have to happen: People would have to admit that they were poor and far from middle class and then act like it, stop using credit, go backwords in the way of phones, computers, and other technologies in the home, etc., or the cost of everything would have to drop across the board, back to the early 70's price wise. We're paying for a lot of invisible things, literally invisible made up things, to justify the amounts that are being charged. I told him that as consumers, we (people in general) now have to choose between buying a carrot and buying an apple. If we're lucky enough to be able to afford both, we definitely can't have the meat, though that then become an option and we can have the meat or the carrot and apple. We can no longer afford what we need to survive.
Does that make sense? Anyway, I'm going to have him read this when he gets up on Saturday. Thanks, Pam.

March 19, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterFrieda Babbley

Hi Ms. Babbley! Yes this is one of my 'tapes'--it's the axe I grind all the time, and every so often I spew it out like this. It just drives me nuts because all we hear about is what's good for middle class families and THERE ARE NO MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES---or rather, there are very few.

I take your point about paying for invisible stuff. I stayed at a job I hated for years because of the health insurance. Then I had chest pains that sent me to the ER in an ambulance from my cubicle, and in 36 hours, WITH insurance, I racked up $15,000 in bills for which I was told I owed $5,000 after the insurance paid. They wanted it immediately. I still hadn't seen a cardiologist and I was broke already, I couldn't pay. The house I bought in 2005 for $39,000 is now valued at around $10,000--this from the bank that financed it. No one will buy it. I could go on and on. You should see the pile of bills we have from our recent household illness. You wouldn't believe it. And that's WITH insurance!

I think we will be going back to a much lower standard of living and a much simpler life, but weirdly I don't mind. I just get mad about all the lying language in DC. They're still zooming us. It gets old.

Well. guess i'm something of a weirdo. i would absolutely say what is described here as 'middle class,' i'd probably consider decadent. $30,000 or $40,000 cars? no way. That's for the rich.

i'd also say we, i guess, are in that upper middle class bracket, but we paid $6,000 cash for an incredible bargain of a car and consider ourselves lucky.... i can attest that $100,000 or so if you have a ton of expenses (legal bills, child support) and live in a high cost of living area is not as much as you think it is--absolutely it can be classed as middle class. We don't live fancy--at all.

i think people's ideas of what 'middle class' are have gotten out of hand with the bubble real estate market and the continuing ideas about consumerism that is like a blight. i think attitudes need to be adjusted more than anything else... That is not to say there aren't many trapped and underemployed--i've been there, too. After 9/11. and health issues would put anybody under the bus financially - that's an obscenity that should be addressed.

i think we need to return to the idea of 'middle class,' however, as more of an idea--an aspiration and planning for the future thing--a respect for education and decency thing. ie, as a student living off $800 per month, not that long ago, nobody ever thought i was anything but middle class - and i always lived in quote, quote 'kinda rough neighborhoods' to boot.

i think the ez street silly tv version of middle class s and the profiteerers areit to blame and is all plastic. Yeah, thanks, madison avenue.

March 21, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLita Sorensen

Good points, Lita. As for the 30-40K cars, I was just looking around the suburban neighborhood where we live and totaling up the cost of the cars parked in the driveways--We don't drive cars like that at our house, but everyone else seems to, or most do. When I worked for a big insurance carrier people would call from the east coast angry about their auto insurance premiums, and I'd look at their policy and they'd have 5 cars and four of them were worth in excess of 40K. And I'd always think, whoa. You can afford a quarter million dollars worth of automobiles and park three of them, but you can't afford to insurance? lol! No pity! (I was polite though.)

Anyhoo, I think the problem is the infamous 'consumer economy' that depends on cheap money and loads of debt to thrive. It can't be sustained. People sort of woke up from a bad dream and now most are not spending, which I see as a good thing, but it isn't going to help the economy in the short run. It's going to cause this long, low bump along the bottom while we all adjust to a more modest, more sane lifestyle, and that in turn will continue to push down wages and benefits and reduce the tax base for cities and states. So it isn't going to be fun. Plus, I think that it is pretty hard to support a family on 44K even being frugal. I guess that's a column for a different day.

I just wanted to point out that statistically speaking, the middle class has been gone for a long time and that the emotional and cultural baggage attached to the term has little to do with what most people actually earn in the U.S. these days. Like you, Bill & I also live frugally and are technically in the statistical 'middle bracket', but if we tried to live in a $130,000 house and buy two new cars we'd be in big trouble fast. That lifestyle is for the rich, not working people, but lots of working people are under the impression they can have it if they just do everything right. Which is unfortunate. It's not the truth. Plus, our neighbors are always mad at us for not trying harder. (That's another column too.) But their property values have fallen nearly 50% in two years, ours about 25%, so there! :D

lol yeah, pam. matt has a client who--both he and his wife--drive $100,000 mercedes...the two of them parked in their garage side by side, how cute! yet they just don't seem to be able to pay their architect on time. ;)

oh, did i say he's a big glenn beck fan? yeah, i'm always polite when we have to do the dinners. however, if the wonder why i'm 'not a big talker,' well, there could be a reason for that.... lol as can be seen by now, i actually have kind of a big mouth. sometimes it is best to keep it shut for the benefit of, basically, matt being paid.

March 21, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLita

Wow I SO 'get' that keep yer mouth shut so's ya get paid thing. Try working at a multinational insurance conglomerate and a huge bank---NOT hotbeds of leftist political opinion. I didn't chat much at those jobs. Learned to keep quiet fast. :D

March 21, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterpgrundy

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>